Are the obligations of the Presidency too much for one man to handle? Many experts in the field of politics feel that our country should be run on a partys beliefs and not souly on the intentions of one man; in some ways, these people hold reason. Take, for example, both the Clinton and Roosevelt scandals. Both of these Presidents left legitmate impacts on the economy, so why did they decide to commit adultery? Was it the pressure that drove them to it?... or basic human instinct?
Kayla J. Walker
AMH1041
TR
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I believe that it may be to much for one person to handle. One person can not decide the fate of an entire country. As far as the two scandals in question, it is human nature to seek affection eslewhere if there not getting it in the home. Boys will be boys.
The pressures of being the President are definitely weighted. Going into the campaign these representatives know what they're in for. For a candidate to fall short, is his/her own fault.
Nicole Cass
AMH1041
TR 1005a
The Clinton and Roosevelt scandals have nothing to do with the pressures of being the president. they were just thinking with the wrong head. regardless, the pressures of being the president must not be that hard if for the past 200 years we have had just one man run the country. furthermore is not really one man, its his cabinet, his advising staff, and congress helping make decisions.
Gabriel Rivera
CPO2001 TR 11:35
Post a Comment